Evidence Review
Keeps literature-review claims traceable to evidence status so adjacent-domain data can't masquerade as validation.
Test report
- Verdict
- Tested · Works
- Score
- Tested
- Jul 15, 2026
- Environment
- Claude Code 2.x (agent harness)
- Upstream re-checked
- Aug 10, 2026 · 992ba91
Ran a 3-source mental-health-chatbot review task both ways: the baseline blurred an RCT, a bare abstract, and an unpublished thesis into one 'validated tool' claim, while the skill-driven run tagged each source's evidence status, refused to let the abstract/thesis support the clinical claim, and logged the missing engagement-to-outcome link as an open gap instead of inferring it.
Scored on four weighted criteria — install, triggering, output vs. baseline, docs. How scoring works
- Installs cleanly 5/5
- Triggers reliably 5/5
- Output vs. baseline 9/10
- Docs & honesty 5/5
What Evidence Review does
Guides drafting of evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps: classifies every source by evidence status (full-text, abstract-only, unpublished, candidate-only), builds claim registers and citation-role plans, and runs overclaim audits before assembly. Triggers on review-paper, thesis literature review, scoping review, gap-map, and overclaim-audit requests.
How to install Evidence Review
git clone https://github.com/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r academic-writing-toolkit/.claude/skills/evidence-review ~/.claude/skills/evidence-review
Skills live in ~/.claude/skills/ (global) or .claude/skills/
(per-project). Restart Claude Code after installing.
Commands — how to trigger Evidence Review
-
/evidence-reviewKeeps literature-review claims traceable to evidence status so adjacent-domain data can't masquerade as validation.
It also activates on plain-language prompts like these:
-
Draft the literature review chapter, avoid overclaiming from sources. -
Build a gap map and claim register for my scoping review. -
Separate the full-text sources from abstract-only ones in my draft.
Frequently asked questions
- Is the Evidence Review skill free?
- Yes. The skill itself is free from yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit. SkillProof publishes the install command and an independent test verdict at no cost.
- Does Evidence Review work with Claude Code?
- We tested it with Claude Code 2.x (agent harness) on Jul 15, 2026. Verdict: Tested · Works. Ran a 3-source mental-health-chatbot review task both ways: the baseline blurred an RCT, a bare abstract, and an unpublished thesis into one 'validated tool' claim, while the skill-driven run tagged each source's evidence status, refused to let the abstract/thesis support the clinical claim, and logged the missing engagement-to-outcome link as an open gap instead of inferring it.
- What is the Evidence Review SkillProof Score?
- 9.6/10 — installs cleanly 5/5, triggers reliably 5/5, output vs. baseline 9/10, docs & honesty 5/5.
- How do I install Evidence Review?
- Copy the install command from this page, run it in your terminal, and restart Claude Code. Skills live in ~/.claude/skills/ (global) or .claude/skills/ inside a project.
- Can I use Evidence Review with Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI, Codex or other AI tools?
- The SKILL.md format is native to Claude (Claude Code, Desktop, claude.ai). The instructions inside adapt to other assistants: Cursor rules, GitHub Copilot instructions, Windsurf rules, Custom GPTs, AGENTS.md for OpenAI Codex, and GEMINI.md for Google Gemini CLI — our conversion guides cover each, and the free converter on the tools page does the wrapping for you.