Research Paper Review

Structured, paper-type-calibrated academic review with an explicit numerical-consistency pass.

Autor: BESSER-PEARL · BESSER-PEARL/research-agent-skills

Testowano · Działa ★ 9.6/10

Research Paper Review — Structured, paper-type-calibrated academic review with an explicit numerical-consistency pass.

Co robi ten skill

Guides a systematic review of an academic paper (PDF/LaTeX/text): venue and paper-type calibration, a structured summary, a dedicated numerical/statistical consistency check (cross-referencing text vs. tables vs. figures, dangling citations/refs), weighted critical analysis, and a fixed feedback template ending in a top-10 prioritized action list. Triggers on paper review, pre-submission feedback, methodology critique, and literature comparison requests.

Raport z testu

Fed both a baseline reviewer and the skill the same synthetic 'FastCache' mini-paper seeded with 4 deliberate inconsistencies; the unguided baseline caught none of them, the skill's Step-3 numerical-check caught all 4 (abstract's 35% vs. results' 28%/41%, 120 vs. 150 devices, a Figure 2 that doesn't exist, a Table 2 marked 'not shown') and produced the mandated Strengths/Weaknesses/Top-10 template.

Testowano: 2026-07-15 · Claude Code 2.x (agent harness)

Instalacja

git clone https://github.com/BESSER-PEARL/research-agent-skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r research-agent-skills/research-paper-review ~/.claude/skills/research-paper-review

Komendy i przykładowe prompty

  • /research-paper-reviewStructured, paper-type-calibrated academic review with an explicit numerical-consistency pass.

Skille uruchamiają się na zwykłe polecenia — bez komend do zapamiętania. Po instalacji aktywują go prompty takie jak te (po angielsku):

  • Can you review this draft paper before I submit it to the conference?
  • Check my manuscript for numerical inconsistencies between text and tables
  • Give me critical, methodology-focused feedback on this research paper