Q Thinking Chain
Three named reasoning techniques -- reframe past the safe answer, destroy an idea, track competing hypotheses.
Getest · Werkt
Wat het doet
A structured-thinking skill bundling three techniques: a three-layer 'reasoning layer' that forces a committed answer past the safe default, an 'adversarial room' that isolates the single fatal assumption behind an idea, and a 'belief updater' that tracks three competing hypotheses as evidence arrives. Triggers on requests for a genuine opinion, a stress-test or critique of a plan, or decision support under uncertainty.
Testrapport
Ran the adversarial-room technique live on a real pitch (an AI Instagram-caption SaaS for photographers): it isolated one falsifiable fatal assumption ('photographers find captions painful enough to pay for') and named a concrete competitor response, a sharper and more mechanistically faithful result than a hedged pros/cons baseline. The parent repo's own README 'What's inside' catalog never mentions this skill (listed internally as 'Claude Chain') at all, so a user browsing the collection would not discover it exists.
Getest op: 2026-07-15 · Claude Code 2.x (agent harness)
Installatie
git clone https://github.com/kju4q/q-claude-skills.git cd q-claude-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r skills/claude-chain ~/.claude/skills/q-thinking-chain # repo folder is named claude-chain; frontmatter name is q-thinking-chain, rename on copy
Commando's en voorbeeldprompts
/q-thinking-chainThree named reasoning techniques -- reframe past the safe answer, destroy an idea, track competing hypotheses.
Skills reageren op gewone verzoeken — geen commando's om te onthouden. Na installatie activeren prompts zoals deze de skill (in het Engels):
stress test my startup pitch and find the one fatal assumptiongive me your real opinion here, not the safe diplomatic answertrack competing explanations for this bug as new evidence comes in