Doubt-Driven Review
Adversarial pre-mortem gate for risky diffs, migrations, and 'this is safe' claims
Promosso
Cosa fa
A single self-contained methodology skill: state the claim, extract artifact+contract, run an adversarial 'find what's wrong' review (fresh subagent, external CLI with approval, or labeled degraded self-review), classify every finding, and stop only on a defined exit condition. Triggers before production, auth, data, billing, or irreversible changes are allowed to stand as 'safe' or 'done'.
Rapporto di test
Ran a real prod-column-drop scenario baseline-vs-skill: baseline gave a decent ad-hoc safety checklist, the skill forced an explicit CLAIM/CONTRACT/adversarial-findings structure that surfaced a missing-backup gap and a lock-contention-under-load edge case the baseline only hinted at, and ended in an auditable 'revise, don't approve yet' decision instead of a soft 'looks fine if...'.
Testato il: 2026-07-14 · Claude Code 2.x (agent harness)
Installazione
git clone https://github.com/pimenov/codex-first-skills-pack cd codex-first-skills-pack mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r skills/doubt-driven-review ~/.claude/skills/doubt-driven-review
Comandi e prompt di esempio
/doubt-driven-reviewAdversarial pre-mortem gate for risky diffs, migrations, and 'this is safe' claims
Gli skill si attivano con richieste in linguaggio naturale, senza comandi da ricordare. Dopo l'installazione, prompt come questi lo attivano (in inglese):
Is it actually safe to drop this column in production?Pre-mortem this migration before I ship it tomorrowChallenge my claim that this refactor is behaviour-preserving