Doubt-Driven Review
Adversarial pre-mortem gate for risky diffs, migrations, and 'this is safe' claims
Testé · Fonctionne
Ce que fait
A single self-contained methodology skill: state the claim, extract artifact+contract, run an adversarial 'find what's wrong' review (fresh subagent, external CLI with approval, or labeled degraded self-review), classify every finding, and stop only on a defined exit condition. Triggers before production, auth, data, billing, or irreversible changes are allowed to stand as 'safe' or 'done'.
Rapport de test
Ran a real prod-column-drop scenario baseline-vs-skill: baseline gave a decent ad-hoc safety checklist, the skill forced an explicit CLAIM/CONTRACT/adversarial-findings structure that surfaced a missing-backup gap and a lock-contention-under-load edge case the baseline only hinted at, and ended in an auditable 'revise, don't approve yet' decision instead of a soft 'looks fine if...'.
Testé le: 2026-07-14 · Claude Code 2.x (agent harness)
Installation
git clone https://github.com/pimenov/codex-first-skills-pack cd codex-first-skills-pack mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r skills/doubt-driven-review ~/.claude/skills/doubt-driven-review
Commandes et exemples de prompts
/doubt-driven-reviewAdversarial pre-mortem gate for risky diffs, migrations, and 'this is safe' claims
Les skills se déclenchent sur des demandes en langage courant — aucune commande à retenir. Après installation, des prompts comme ceux-ci l'activent (en anglais) :
Is it actually safe to drop this column in production?Pre-mortem this migration before I ship it tomorrowChallenge my claim that this refactor is behaviour-preserving