Doubt-Driven Review

Adversarial pre-mortem gate for risky diffs, migrations, and 'this is safe' claims

par pimenov · pimenov/codex-first-skills-pack

Testé · Fonctionne ★ 9.2/10

Doubt-Driven Review — Adversarial pre-mortem gate for risky diffs, migrations, and 'this is safe' claims

Ce que fait

A single self-contained methodology skill: state the claim, extract artifact+contract, run an adversarial 'find what's wrong' review (fresh subagent, external CLI with approval, or labeled degraded self-review), classify every finding, and stop only on a defined exit condition. Triggers before production, auth, data, billing, or irreversible changes are allowed to stand as 'safe' or 'done'.

Rapport de test

Ran a real prod-column-drop scenario baseline-vs-skill: baseline gave a decent ad-hoc safety checklist, the skill forced an explicit CLAIM/CONTRACT/adversarial-findings structure that surfaced a missing-backup gap and a lock-contention-under-load edge case the baseline only hinted at, and ended in an auditable 'revise, don't approve yet' decision instead of a soft 'looks fine if...'.

Testé le: 2026-07-14 · Claude Code 2.x (agent harness)

Installation

git clone https://github.com/pimenov/codex-first-skills-pack
cd codex-first-skills-pack
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r skills/doubt-driven-review ~/.claude/skills/doubt-driven-review

Commandes et exemples de prompts

  • /doubt-driven-reviewAdversarial pre-mortem gate for risky diffs, migrations, and 'this is safe' claims

Les skills se déclenchent sur des demandes en langage courant — aucune commande à retenir. Après installation, des prompts comme ceux-ci l'activent (en anglais) :

  • Is it actually safe to drop this column in production?
  • Pre-mortem this migration before I ship it tomorrow
  • Challenge my claim that this refactor is behaviour-preserving