Screened · automated checks passed

ios-localization

from dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills · ★ 895 on GitHub · found by our crawler 2026-07-07

What the author says it does

Implement, review, or improve localization and internationalization in iOS/macOS apps — String Catalogs (.xcstrings), generated localizable symbols, stable key naming, LocalizedStringKey, LocalizedStringResource, pluralization, FormatStyle for numbers/dates/measurements, right-to-left layout, Dynamic Type, and locale-aware formatting. Use when adding multi-language support, setting up String Catalogs, enabling generated symbols for compile-time-safe localization keys, handling plural forms, formatting dates/numbers/currencies for different locales, testing localizations, or making UI work correctly in RTL languages like Arabic and Hebrew.

Quoted from the skill's own SKILL.md trigger description — this is what tells Claude when to activate it. Not yet verified by us.

Automated screening

100/100 validator score

Scored by the same rules as our free SKILL.md validator: trigger description quality, body substance, structure. Automated — a human bench test is the next step in the pipeline.

Install (unverified — review first)

git clone https://github.com/dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills
# skill lives at: skills/ios-localization/SKILL.md

SkillProof status

This skill is in our test queue. We install every skill in a clean environment, run a trigger battery and score output against a baseline before it earns a catalog page — the full protocol is public. Until then, treat it like any unreviewed dependency: read the SKILL.md and any scripts before installing.

Already tested in Testing & QA

  • Screen Reader Testing ★ 9.6/10 Screen reader testing playbook for VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS with ARIA fixes.
  • Skill Security Auditor ★ 9.6/10 OWASP-mapped code/secrets/config audit with working bundled scan scripts
  • Web Quality Audit ★ 9.6/10 Lighthouse-style audit across Performance, Accessibility, SEO, and Best Practices with severity tiers.
  • OSINT Methodology ★ 9.6/10 Structured 5-stage external recon methodology with confidence levels, severity rubric, and OpSec rules.

Top 10 Testing skills, ranked →